December 26, 2025

"Your Source for Bold Stories, Fresh Voices, and Unfiltered Entertainment."

Habari Entertainment Home - Politics - DOJ Epstein File Release Expands Allegations, Raises New Questions About Trump’s Ties

DOJ Epstein File Release Expands Allegations, Raises New Questions About Trump’s Ties

Image

Image

Image

Image

The U.S. Department of Justice has released another significant set of records connected to the long-running federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, revealing new allegations, internal correspondence, and travel records that deepen scrutiny around Epstein’s powerful associates and the government’s handling of the case.

While officials continue to warn that some materials remain unverified or heavily redacted, the latest disclosure introduces new claims involving Donald Trump, alongside additional documentation of his past proximity to Epstein.


FBI File Contains Rape Allegation Involving Trump

Among the most serious revelations is a previously undisclosed FBI case file dated October 2020. The document, identified by an internal case number and released with extensive redactions, contains an allegation of sexual assault naming Trump.

The file does not identify the accuser by name. According to the record, an unnamed individual alleged that Trump raped her, stating that the assault occurred in connection with Epstein. The account describes being taken to a high-end location by another woman and alleges that both men were involved.

The DOJ has not brought criminal charges against Trump related to this allegation, and the document does not indicate whether the claim was fully investigated, substantiated, or closed without action.


Limousine Driver Account Raises Alarming Context

The same FBI file references a statement from a limousine driver, whose identity is also redacted. The driver reported a phone conversation involving Trump during a ride to an airport in the mid-1990s that the driver described as deeply troubling.

According to the document, Trump repeatedly referenced Epstein by name during the call and made comments that suggested abuse of a young woman. The file characterizes the conversation as “very concerning,” though it does not indicate that the driver witnessed a crime directly.

As with other materials in the release, the DOJ has not confirmed whether this account led to formal investigative action.


Internal DOJ Email Details Trump’s Travel on Epstein’s Jet

In addition to the allegation file, newly released internal correspondence from federal prosecutors outlines previously undisclosed details about Trump’s travel history with Epstein.

An email authored by an assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York states that Trump flew aboard Epstein’s private aircraft “many more times than previously reported” during the 1990s. According to the email, Trump traveled on Epstein’s jet at least eight times between 1993 and 1996.

The correspondence notes that on several of these flights, Ghislaine Maxwell was present. In one instance, Trump is listed as traveling only with Epstein and a 20-year-old passenger whose identity remains redacted.

The prosecutor’s email explicitly references timeframes that federal authorities later used when building the trafficking case against Maxwell, who is now serving a 20-year prison sentence.


No Charges, But Mounting Public Pressure

Federal officials have repeatedly stated that Trump has not been charged with crimes related to Epstein. The DOJ has also cautioned that the document release includes raw investigative material that does not represent formal findings or conclusions.

Still, the combination of allegations, flight records, and witness accounts has intensified calls from survivors and advocacy groups for greater accountability—not only for Epstein’s inner circle, but for institutions that failed to fully expose his network while he was alive.

Several survivors have argued that releasing documents without explanatory context risks confusion while simultaneously confirming long-standing concerns that powerful individuals were shielded from scrutiny.


Transparency Without Context Leaves Critical Gaps

Legal experts have warned that releasing massive quantities of investigative records without annotations, timelines, or authentication creates an environment where false documents, partial truths, and serious allegations coexist without clarity.

Earlier in the release, federal officials acknowledged that at least one sensational document circulating publicly was fabricated, reinforcing concerns about how the information is being consumed and interpreted.


A Case That Still Refuses to Close

Rather than bringing resolution, the DOJ’s latest disclosure reinforces how unfinished the Epstein investigation remains. Allegations of rape, evidence of repeated contact with elites, and internal government correspondence now sit in the public record—without definitive answers.

For many observers, the files do not simply reopen old wounds; they highlight how power, secrecy, and institutional failure allowed Epstein’s crimes to persist for decades.

As journalists continue to examine the documents, one conclusion is unavoidable: the Epstein case is not history—it is an ongoing reckoning.